The past year has seen some remarkable pieces of multimedia journalism.
From a stunning biography of a drug addict turned boxer, to a fluent and comprehensive look at the drugs trade in Mexico, to a mind-blowing flash based project on the Great Lakes.
And that’s just the professionals.
Here’s the thing: they’re all coming from journalists and newsrooms – in America.
Clockwise from left: ESPN, Boston Globe, NYTimes, Chris Carmichael
A quick visit to the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR and ESPN reveal a plethora of enticing, exciting and well produced multimedia projects. Go more local and you can find stunning multimedia from the Boston Globe and the Roanake Times.
More and more have their own designers who work with flash to give them an asthetic appeal as well as journalistic clout.
So what does the UK have in response? The Guardian’s multimedia page has a healthy selection of new videos and the occasional audio slideshow, not to mention some worthy experiments in data sharing, for example this attractive interactive on UK public spending. And there is some nice video pieces – including this excellent alternative look at exam results by John Domokos.
But there are few interactive flash stories, and nothing on the scale of War Without Borders or One in Eight Million (both NY Times).
The BBC News website is (for obvious reasons) packed with original video and audio, and on big stories you’ll find a decent interactive map. But nothing with the ambition and groundbreaking attitude we see over the pond.
You’ll find the occasional audio slideshow, for example this tidy piece marking the anniversary of the Lehman Brothers collapse, but again they are left as slideshows alone and not developed into something bigger.
So come on, UK newsrooms, where are you?
Of course it’s all about money, or the lack of it. It is not as if UK media don’t have the talent. But can money really be an excuse? American papers afterall have been hit harder than British ones with more big city closures and layoffs: almost all UK papers that were in print a year ago are still in print today. And of course there are many talented freelancers and independent producers making great stuff, but even that is hard to find.
So what else is it? A lack of ambition? We just don’t get multimedia? Or are we just not interested?
The postcard below awaits your thoughts…
Now we all make dodgy editorial judgements sometimes, but I really can’t fathom this one from the editors at BBC News Online….