A wealth of journalism inspiration from New York
I’m sure most readers of this blog also follow US new media giant Jeff Jarvis’ blog over at Buzz Machine.
Jeff was telling us the future of journalism is entrepreneurial before anyone had really considered it and Buzz Machine is a hive of interesting writing. Today Jeff posted the results of an Entrepreneurial Journalism class where his CUNY students have been pitching their own business ideas.
For obvious reasons he’s not giving much away, but what he did reveal about the pitches that won some development cash (and those that didn’t) offers some excellent inspiration and ideas to the rest of us:
The four ideas that won some money from the McCormick Foundation are (emphasis mine)
- a platform for news assignments
- a mobile sports application
- a creative, algorithmic answer to filter failure
- and ClosetTour a new media site dedicated to fashion
And those that didn’t:
- a specialised womens travel service
- a specialised local real estate (property) service
- a cool food idea
- 2 business-to-business ideas
- a hyperlocal idea
- a service for NGOs
- a commercial service for NGOs
What’s great is the huge variety of ideas – covering news, fashion, food, sport. What’s more as Jeff notes:
A few were built around the need not just to create content but to curate it. Most are highly targeted. Some saw the potential in specialised local services. Some saw the need to go mobile to service the public. Some are international. Some are multimedia. A few saw the need to make news fun, others to make news useful.
And Jeff stressed the need for every business to cut a profit in order to survive. We must be capitalist about it now.
Anyone outside of CUNY or the US should read this and take inspiration. Although Jeff’s descriptions are necessarily vague, use them to fuel your own ideas and thoughts for entrepreneurial models. Think about the importance of serving a market, having a niche, finding a gap in the market – and being able to sum up your business in an elevator pitch.
Earlier today a friend showed me plans for an exciting news business in the North of England, which I can’t say anything about at the moment. But all this adds strength to my conviction that, if 2009 was the year of “great media collapse” then 2010 will be the year it rises from the ashes.
Ideas 003: event based reporting
I’ve opened up a new category on the blog. It’s called Ideas for the future of news and here I’m collating good, tangible, positive, innovative ideas on how journalism can move forward.
Previous articles:
Ideas 002: students as investigators
Ideas 001: the news aggregator
Idea: The Berlin Project
By: Alex Wood, Sheena Rossiter, Marcus Gilroy-Ware, Dominique Van Heerden, Marco Woldt
The five people behind the Berlin Project are the perfect example of young journalists refusing to be battered by economic storms, or waiting for journalism to sort itself out. When many recent graduates would have been preparing themselves for another 3-week unpaid internship at some dodgy music mag, or scouring the papers for PR jobs, these guys decided to go do some journalism instead.
It takes a fair bit of chutzpah to fly yourself out to Germany to cover the Berlin Wall anniversary with no real audience and not much financial backing. But they did, and you can see the results on their website.
Under the banner “journalism like you never thought possible” they went into Berlin under the radar covering the unofficial story. The site is a real multimedia mash too with audio, video packages, mobile video and photographs rolled into one.
Something lots of the big boys talk about all the time, but rarely produce themselves.
This aside, I’ve labelled the Berlin Project as an example of event-based reporting, a different angle on journalism, and one perhaps with commercial possibilities?
The Berlin Project was about one event, and offering in-depth coverage of that time defined moment. It is nothing new of course, we’re all used to ’special coverage’ of the Olympics, elections, and remembrance services in the mainstream media.
But until now, they’ve been an extension of larger broadcasters or papers.
I think the advantage of the Berlin Project is its size (small, nimble) and therefore flexibility. They were also able to work cheaply, getting footage on iPhones and editing it quickly with iMovie. All told, a valuable alternative to mainstream coverage.
And I wonder for a second whether there’s a business model here too? Imagine being commissioned to cover all sorts of awesome events, because its what you do really well. It’s not a traditional niche, but hey- a niche is a niche right?
The Berlin Project team were able to get backing from Reuters and do some business with smaller sites and Alex reckons they’ll break even, all told. Not bad for a pilot project. And there could be plans for more events coverage in 2010.
And even if you don’t like the idea, these guys have shown what’s possible when you just get off your ass and do something.
Journalism posts: Summary III
Time for another quick recap on the journalism posts on here since my last round-up in August.
Future of Journalism
The future of journalism: in vs out
Thinking like a startup for journalists
Why I’m glad Murdoch’s charging for content
What can next generation journalists learn from Les Paul?
Is there an Atlantic divide in journalism?
Can journalism save the environment?
What Simon Cowell can teach you about the future of news
Multimedia Journalism
“For people to act, they must truly believe”
5 rules for multimedia journalists to break (and 5 they can’t)
Getting to know The GIMP (photo-editing software)
5 reasons why UK newspapers still don’t get multimedia
How to launch your own Indie-Journalism site
A snapshot of how video journalism should be
One easy step to simplify your storytelling
Multimedia Journalism on the frontline
The 6×6 series
Click here for all the 6×6 articles and the free ebook.
The figure of 8: simplify your storytelling
Teaching my class on Video & Photo Journalism at Kingston University last week, I introduced my students to the concept of the Figure of Eight.
It’s a handy storytelling tool I was taught when I trained to be a journalist, and I’ve always kept it in mind when I need to put a story together in a rush. It is a tool for broadcast journalists, but applies to newspaper journalists working with video too.
The Print Way
Newspaper journalists are usually told to arrange their facts in the paradigm of the inverted pyramid, still regarded as the best way to display text information. You put all the important information right at the top and work your way down from there.
It was invented around the time of the telegraph message, when you had limited space to get lots of information down.
Many newspaper journalists make the mistake of trying to fit this way of sorting information into their video and audio. It doesn’t work. Why? Because multimedia exists differently.
The ‘Broadcast’ Way
Television & Radio – and now video & audio are temporal media. They exist in time. We don’t talk about TV news reports in terms of word counts. We talk about them in terms of time. Time is a tricky dimension because it means all your information has to be laid out in a linear fashion, and usually your audience has only one chance to watch your piece.
Compare that to newspapers, where the reader can skip ahead, or re-read bits they didn’t understand.
Because of it’s unique time-governed nature, broadcast journalists developed a new framework for organising their facts: introducing the Figure of Eight.
The Figure of Eight

Broken down it simply means this:
- Start your multimedia piece in the present: what’s just happened? What’s the latest?
- Then take them backwards and tell them the past: what’s the context? How did we get here? What’s already happened?
- Then, finally, loop back over and tell them the future: what’s going to happen next?
This method ticks all the boxes for getting your facts out: it gives them the who-what-where-when-why, fills in the context, and gives us an idea of what it all means by suggesting what will happen next.
A Classic Example
Say you’re producing a video piece about a court case, for which the verdict has just been announced. You start your piece by saying what’s just happened:
Joe Bloggs has been found guilty of killing his wife in a domestic row. After a trial which has gripped the country, the father of three walked into the dock just an hour ago to hear his fate…etc…
Then you tell us the background – take us back to the history of the story.
This tragic case started a year ago when police were called to the Bloggs family home in London. They found Jane Bloggs dead with a knife in her chest. After a man hunt lasting three months, her husband Joe was arrested in April…etc…
Then to finish off – a quick line on what’ll happen next.
Bloggs will return to the Old Bailey tomorrow where he’ll be sentenced. The Judge has warned him to expect a long jail term…etc.
That way, we’ve covered the bones of the story, in a logical fashion.
It’s a great technique for two reasons: it organises the information for you so you don’t have to; and it is perfect for a temporal medium like video.
…wait! There’s more!
If you found my 6×6 series for multimedia journalists useful, from Monday you’ll be able to download it all in one handy (free) ebook. More details on the way!
News 21’s media scroller: a new way of presenting multimedia?
I’ve spent some time playing with Arizona University’s Carnegie-Knight funded multimedia project News 21.
It’s headline is one I fully subscribe to: “A New Generation Produces a New Form of Journalism“.
Amen to that. It’s good to see a project dedicated to finding new ways of doing old things, and they’re coming up with some good stuff. For example: how about this- a multimedia scroller to view photos and video associated with a text story.
You read through the text as you would any other online piece. But rather than having photographs & videos embedded within the text, it appears above the words as and when.
As you scroll down to a new paragraph, a photo illustrating the point appears. Scroll down a bit further, and it is replaced with some video which you can play instantly.
News 21’s current version isn’t much to look at, but it is certainly easy to use and gives a much more integrated way of experiencing multimedia. More please!
5 reasons why UK newspapers still don’t get multimedia
I wrote last week about the growing gap between the US and Europe in the quantity and originality of multimedia journalism.
But as well as lacking style, originality, interactivity, some UK papers still have a worrying lack of quality.
I’ve put together some general examples so show what I mean. A couple of disclaimers though:
- they’ve been collected from two local papers owned by one group, but the same issues seem to exist in other groups in other parts of the country.
- these are local/regional papers and it must be noted they have smaller budgets and prefer to give their print journalists a camera, rather than bringing in multimedia expertise
- the following is not a criticism of the journalism, the quality of which is exceptional; rather the way it is presented
5 reasons why UK papers still don’t get multimedia
01. poor pictures

Newspapers have a big advantage with pictures: they have professional photographers to take them. So why are the photographs on this website compressed so much? And why can’t we click on them to get a really big high quality version? (the answer I suspect lies in the fear of copyright)
02. weird web domains
![]()
My website is not called www.amalemultimediajournalistbasedinlondon.co.uk. Let’s call a spade a spade and maybe more people will be able to find the website. It’s a strange choice too, because the “This is…” brand, although used on all the local websites owned by this group, does not relate to the print version’s brand at all.
03. bizarre breaking news

This example shows three “breaking news” updates, on the same page, on the same story. As well as filling up the page with repetitive stories, it also diminishes the value of using “breaking news”. The solution: just update the single page – that way your readers can find all they need on a story in one click. (Again I suspect it’s designed to get more clicks rather than benefit the reader).

And I don’t need to explain why this “breaking news” is anything but.
04. uncontrolled comments

This particular newspaper seems to have no problem with allowing comments on every story, including some legally contentious ones. I have read the likes of ‘the scumbag should rot in hell’ on coverage of murder trials, where the verdict is yet to be reached, as well as the quite frankly tasteless and upsetting comments allowed on the above example.
Notice too, how small and out-of-the-way the photograph is. It tells the story more than the words, and should be full size and central.
05. virtually invisible video

This newspaper group takes its online video seriously and was one of the first in the UK to get its hacks trained. I have seen their small lightweight cameras appear at many crime scenes and press conferences. And while it is rarely cinematographic, it does deserve to be more prominent than the banner adverts which surround it. Shouldn’t it be in the central column?
It may seem otherwise, but I am really not trying to single out one paper or one group. These papers as you can see on some of the mastheads, actually won multimedia awards two years in a row! But we have to start recognising poor use of multimedia, discussing it, and improving it. The longer it remains amateurish, the fewer eyeballs it gets and ultimately advertisers/subscribers cash.
And as much as it may pain the wallets upstairs, these five examples will only get better with more cash, more investment and some multimedia trained journalists.













1 comment